We have a lot of discussion these days about the legalization of substances, especially cannabis. These discussions and articles give attention to how it might increase the economy, to decriminalization resulting in fewer fatalities and a drop in the growth of HIV cases, to medical great things about marijuana. You might expect someone who witnesses the difficulties and occasional damage that substances cause to be firmly against legalization. This is not automatically the case. All things considered, consider alcohol and tobacco are legal, and yet they are really listed as the most destructive substances to individuals and society currently. Then simply again, this might be a reason not to legalize other substances. In this article the emphasis is to never focus solely on legalization, but on the motive for element use, and just how that is more important than their legal status. medical benefits of weed
Within a class I teach at FIU on the Mindsets of Drugs and Medicine Abuse I am often asked basically think pot should be legalized. I actually usually try not to express my judgment immediately, but instead present and entertain discussion on the topic. But recently We were pushed for an answer, and I responded: “I once read an outstanding book called ‘Amusing Ourselves to Death: Community Discourse in the Age group of Television. ‘ The things i remember most from that book is how often we bottom our decisions on inadequate information (in the circumstance of the book’s point of view, depending on tv set images. Consider elections for example). Thus my best answer is I probably do not have enough information to call and make an educated decision. ” Yet , based on Amsterdam and Portugal’s experience of fewer problems because of this of decriminalization, it seems like it is at least a viable option. Of course, if the U. T took that approach, there is first no ensure it would go the same way, and second I would anticipate an explosive increase in material use initially. The difficulty is: will be the rewards well worth it?
One thing that concerns me about the American people’s substance 2 the motivation. According to VH1’s documentary on “The Drug Years” the primary embrace marijuana and hallucinogen utilization in the 1960s was a response to attempting to achieve enlightenment and a sense of oneness and communion. This is noticeable in the images we now have of that time: sit-ins, free drugs being provided at musical events, and wanting others to “turn-on” and experience the sense of love and oneness that others were reaching and that a mindsets lecturer at Harvard called Timothy Leary was in favor of.
Initially, that seems to have been the goal. But times have altered since the sixties, and let’s face it; even then the movement was not completely successful. We all American’s invariably is an individualistic culture. On the continuum between individualism and collectivism People in the usa definitely fall privately of individualism, which is described as everyone looking out for themselves or their family first. This can be opposed to collectivism, where the group is cohesive, and the place that the group protects one another and the individual looks away for the group above their personal needs. Applying these definitions, it is quite easy to point out Americans are on the individualism side of the spectrum. The movement in the sixties (which in some regards continues, experience “one human race” and “coexist” stickers) to help make the human competition more united, now more in tune with our planet and its needs, is not grand enough to alter the individualistic character of this culture yet. And it is the judgment of this copy writer that the individualistic frame of mind of this culture has even altered the inspiration of drugs in the beginning used to enhance a sense of oneness and enlightenment.